Editorial standards

The rules behind every word.

How we record sources, describe review and correct mistakes in our informational catalogue.

Publication is not certification. Programme pages present five questions and the answers held in the catalogue. Missing answers show Answer not available. A published page is not an eligibility decision or evidence that every answer has received independent review.

1. Sources and provenance

Recorded source links are provided where available. A URL alone does not prove that every claim is supported, independently reviewed or current. Check the supporting passage and any limitations for the specific programme.

Issuing authorities, legislation and gazettes are the preferred evidence for immigration rules. Embassy guidance and professional or secondary summaries must be identified as such; they must not be described as the issuing authority. Country-context datasets do not establish visa rules.

This page makes no measured percentage claim about direct official provenance. Inventory size, source availability and reviewed evidence are different measures.

2. What review means

Antonio Mira leads the product and editorial process. AI tools assist research, drafting and consistency checks. An author name, source link or automated check does not establish independent professional review. A specific review must identify its scope, reviewer and date before it is described as such.

A captured document records the material supplied or retrieved. Checking that the quoted words occur in it is a source-content check; it is not independent legal advice or proof that every programme condition has been resolved.

Before acting: inspect the source for the exact programme and confirm the requirements with the competent authority. Dates attached to a capture or page update do not certify a fresh review of every underlying fact.

3. Informational scope

The current questionnaire provides programme references and recorded information. It does not produce eligibility verdicts, approval probabilities or country rankings. Historical scoring descriptions are not the current methodology. See methodology for the contract and its limits.

4. Editorial voice

State the recorded requirement: Explain the programme and identify the supporting source.
Keep unknowns explicit: Missing information must not become a positive requirement, an exemption or a claim of completeness.
Separate fact from calculation: Identify derived amounts, units, periods and applicant scope. A comparison needs compatible evidence for both sides.

Useful content, without a word quota

We set no minimum word count. A page should answer its specific question with useful, source-linked information and explicit gaps. Extra length, repeated links and filler do not establish quality. Content length may be measured for diagnosis; it is not a publication requirement.

5. Corrections

Report an error to hello@wheretoemigrate.io with the page and supporting source. Our existing refund and correction policy continues to govern customer remedies. Corrections must identify what changed and their scope; a prepared correction is not a published correction. Published errata are at /errata.

6. Update limits

Reviews are performed in bounded batches or when a material change is flagged. There is no guaranteed re-check cycle for every programme and no universal automated monitoring of government rules. A current page date must not imply that every linked source has just been checked.

7. Affiliates

Affiliate relationships are disclosed in the affiliate policy. A referral link is not evidence for an immigration rule or a professional review.

8. AI assistance

AI assists the work described above. We do not claim that every item has been reviewed by an independent specialist. The responsibility for editorial decisions remains with the product owner.

9. Limits

We provide research information, not legal advice, representation or application filing. See limitations. The five public questions and answers are separate from report criteria and do not certify that report research is complete.